His warning was unambiguous:
“No matter what religion… no matter where you come from… we Nigerians are being killed. And our government seems to be incapable of protecting us.”
For a former commander-in-chief to make such a statement is not only alarming—it is evidence, in the eyes of many activists, that Nigeria’s insecurity is not accidental. It is systemic.
video source: https://x.com/SaharaReporters/status/1994506045570298037
1. “We Had Capacity”: A Revelation That Exposes Nigeria’s Contradictions
The former president went further, revealing that even during his administration Nigeria possessed the intelligence capacity to identify and track criminals anywhere in the country. The only gap, he said, was the lack of rapid retrieval technology.
But today?
“Now we have capacity. With drones, you can slay them up. You can take them up. Why are we not doing that? Why are we apologizing? Why are we negotiating?”
Why indeed?
This rhetorical question has become fuel for activists across the world who argue that the only logical explanation for deliberate under-action is state-enabled complicity. When a government has the tools, the drones, the surveillance equipment, and the intelligence—but still refuses to eliminate groups who massacre villagers, kidnap students, and burn churches—the silence begins to look like consent.
Many observers interpret this as yet another piece of evidence that powerful individuals within government structures may be benefiting politically or financially from ongoing terror, or using these militias to control regions and silence resistance.
This is the heart of the activist argument:
If a government can stop terror but refuses to, then terror becomes a political instrument.
2. Why the Victims Are Mostly Christian Communities
The former president condemned those who try to hide the identity of victims:
“For anybody to say because those who are being killed belong to this region or this religion… cannot be an acceptable excuse.”
For over a decade, the majority of large-scale massacres, village raids, kidnappings of schoolchildren, and targeted killings have occurred in Christian-majority regions: the Middle Belt, Southern Kaduna, Plateau, parts of Benue, and the eastern forest corridors.
Activists argue that the government’s inaction—combined with official narratives that downplay the identity of victims—creates the appearance of a deliberate tolerance of atrocities against Christians and minority ethnic groups.
Whether or not the state is directly sponsoring terror, the consistent refusal to act is interpreted by millions as complicity.
3. Recognition of Biafra: The Only Permanent Security Blueprint for the Region
The call for Biafra recognition is no longer driven only by history or emotion. It is rooted in security logic and economic reality:
a. A Self-Governing Biafra Would Protect Its People
A sovereign Biafra would refuse to negotiate with terrorists, refuse to shield them, and refuse to use them as political tools. The region has the capacity for:
-
Rapid drone deployment
-
Territorial border control
-
Community-based security networks
-
Transparent leadership accountable to its own population
b. Economic Transformation of the Gulf of Guinea & Sahel
Biafra sits on one of Africa’s most strategic economic corridors. A stable, secure Biafra could:
-
Create a high-security trade zone linking the Sahel to the Atlantic
-
Develop tech-enabled policing and surveillance along the oil and gas axis
-
Become a regional hub for education, seaports, manufacturing, and digital innovation
A peaceful, thriving Biafra would reduce regional instability—drastically weakening the terror networks exploiting Nigeria’s vast ungoverned spaces.
c. Ending the Arms Flow & Militia Expansion
The Sahel is overrun by state-sponsored and freelance jihadist groups. Nigeria’s weak border systems have turned the entire northern belt into an open highway for arms and foreign fighters.
A recognized Biafra, with its own security architecture, would:
-
Close the eastern corridor used by terror groups
-
Create counter-terror partnerships directly with ECOWAS, AU, and Western allies
-
Protect churches, communities, and vulnerable women and children without political interference
4. If the Nigerian Government Cannot Protect Its Citizens, the International Community Must Act
The former president stated it plainly:
“If our government cannot do it, we have the right to call on the international community to do for us what our government cannot do.”
Recognition of Biafra is not secession for the sake of separation.
It is international intervention through political restructuring.
It is a permanent solution to:
-
End the cycle of Christian massacres
-
Restore stability to the Gulf of Guinea
-
Strengthen the Sahel’s economic corridor
-
Break the chain of state-assisted terrorism
Conclusion: The Speech That Exposed a Truth Nigeria Can No Longer Hide
The former president and commander -in-chief Olusegun Obasanjo may not have intended to expose the deeper contradictions of the Nigerian state—but he did. His words validate what millions already believe:
-
The Nigerian security architecture is not failing by accident.
-
The victims are not protected because they are not politically prioritized.
-
Terror persists because it benefits powerful actors.
And so, activists argue:
Biafra is not just a political option—it is a survival strategy.
It is the only road to safety, prosperity, and dignity for millions who have been abandoned.
If Nigeria refuses to stop the killings, the world must support those seeking to protect themselves.
Recognition of Biafra is not a threat to Africa’s stability.
It is the key to restoring it.
Support the Diplomatic Engagements and Liberation of the Biafra Homeland through the Biafra Republic Government in Exile - the only legitimate government to represent the Biafra people. Read more about:
3. Donate
4. IOU
No comments:
Post a Comment